|
Significant new potential for hydropower exists and
new types of hydropower technologies are being developed. FERC has seen
an increasing interest in new hydrokinetic technologies that would
generate electricity from waves or from the flow of water in ocean
currents, tides, or inland waterways.
FERC has issued preliminary permits for these types
of projects in numerous states, including Alaska, California, Oregon,
and Washington. A number of preliminary permit applications are
pending. FERC has also issued licenses for projects in Washington and
Minnesota.
Because of this surge of applications for
preliminary permits, FERC issued a
Notice of Inquiry and Interim Policy Statement
on February 15, 2007, to seek comments on how it should treat
applications for preliminary permits to study hydropower projects
involving proposals to utilize wave, current, and instream new
technology methods to develop hydropower. Comments supported using a
“strict scrutiny” approach to issuing preliminary permits.
FERC has taken steps to reduce regulatory barriers
to developing pilot projects that test new technologies and allow
monitoring and study of aquatic resource impacts. In April of 2008,
FERC issued a
white paper on hydrokinetic pilot project licensing procedures. The
process is available for projects that are (1) 5 megawatts or less; (2)
for a short term; (3) removable and able to be shutdown on relatively
short notice; (4) not located in waters with sensitive designations; (5)
removed, with the site restored, before the end of the license term
(unless a new license is granted); and, (6) initiated by a draft
application sufficient to support environmental analysis.
FERC's goal is to complete pilot project
licensing in as few as six months. FERC envisions that these pilot
project licenses would typically be for five-year periods. Once the
pilot project is complete, the project proponent would apply for a
standard license or would decommission and restore the site. For more
information on FERC's proposal for pilot projects,
click here.
On November 30, 2007, FERC issued a policy statement that allows it to
issue conditioned licenses for hydrokinetic energy projects under
certain circumstances, even if other authorizations required under
federal law are outstanding. Pursuant to this policy, FERC may issue
conditioned licenses predicated on the license being precluded from
commencing construction until the necessary authorizations are
received. The original policy statement has been modified in response
to public comments. Details on the conditioned license policy can be
found
here.
FERC and MMS continue to assert jurisdiction over hydrokinetic projects
on the Outer Continental Shelf (“OCS”). On July 9, 2008, MMS issued
proposed regulations for granting leases, easements, and rights-of-way
for alternative energy project activities on the OCS. FERC submitted
comments on MMS’s proposed regulations detailing FERC’s perceived role
in permitting and licensing hydrokinetic projects on the OCS.
Click here
for more information on FERC’s comments. On October 16, 2008, FERC
issued an order reasserting its jurisdiction over hydrokinetic projects
on the OCS pursuant to the Federal Power Act. For more information on
how FERC’s licensing procedures and MMS’s proposed rules will play out,
click here.
A summary of MMS’s proposed regulations can be found
here.
On November 21, 2008, the Department of Energy issued a
Draft
Report to Congress on the Environmental Effects of Marine and
Hydrokinetic Energy Projects. The report, prepared pursuant to the
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (“EISA”), describes (1) the
potential environmental impacts of marine and hydrokinetic energy
technologies; (2) options to mitigate and prevent adverse environmental
impacts; (3) the role of monitoring and adaptive management; and (4) the
key elements of an adaptive management program. The final report to
Congress is to be submitted in June of 2009.
Although there is significant momentum behind hydrokinetic project
development, regulatory challenges remain. The California Public
Utilities Commission recently rejected a power purchase agreement
between Pacific Gas & Electric and Finavera Renewables for the output of
Finavera's proposed 2 MW wave energy project in Humboldt County,
California, finding that the technology was not reliable and that the
power purchase agreement price was not reasonable.
Click here
for more information on the Commission’s decision.
Pending Incentive Legislation for New Hydro Technologies
There are a number of pending bills that would provide incentives for
these emerging technologies. Several of these bills are sponsored by
Northwest Senators and Representatives.
See the
Pending Legislation section of this web site for bills relating to
new hydro technologies.
|